Supreme Court: Live-Streamed Hearings Not for Commercial Gain, Says CJI Surya Kant
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant reiterated that the Supreme Court's bar on commercial use of live-streamed proceedings is not intended to restrict viewing or court reportage. The clarification aims to prevent profiteering from judicial content while maintaining transparency.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on [date] clarified that the Supreme Court's explicit bar on the commercial exploitation of live-streamed proceedings does not constitute a gag or restriction on viewing or court reportage. The statement came during a hearing, emphasizing that the measure is aimed at preventing third parties from profiting off judicial content.
The Supreme Court has been live-streaming Constitution Bench proceedings since 2018, significantly enhancing transparency and public access to the judiciary. However, concerns arose that commercial entities might repackage and monetize these streams without authorization. The Chief Justice's remarks underscore the court's commitment to open justice while safeguarding against misuse. "The bar is not on viewing or reporting, but on commercial gain," he reportedly stated.
The clarification is expected to reassure media organizations and citizens that live-streaming remains a tool for public education and oversight. It also sets a precedent for other courts in India and potentially influences global discussions on judicial transparency. Next steps may include issuing formal guidelines to distinguish between permissible reportage and prohibited commercial use, ensuring that the integrity of live-streamed proceedings is maintained.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a Comment