BREAKING
LIVE MARKETS
US📈 S&P 500$5,738.17▲ 0.41% METAL🥇 GOLD$2,658.40/oz▲ 0.52% ENERGY🛢️ BRENT$71.89/bbl▲ 0.68% CRYPTO₿ BTC$65,840.00▲ 1.85% IN🇮🇳 NIFTY 50₹26,178.95▲ 0.30% METAL🥈 SILVER$31.62/oz▲ 1.18% US💻 NASDAQ$18,179.59▲ 0.60% ENERGY🛢️ WTI CRUDE$68.18/bbl▲ 0.75% CRYPTOΞ ETH$2,664.20▲ 2.10% IN🇮🇳 SENSEX₹85,571.85▲ 0.28% US🏛️ DOW$42,313.00▲ 0.33% CRYPTO◎ SOL$156.40▲ 4.30% UK🇬🇧 FTSE 100£8,320.72▲ 0.43% CRYPTO⬡ BNB$598.20▲ 0.85% US📈 S&P 500$5,738.17▲ 0.41% METAL🥇 GOLD$2,658.40/oz▲ 0.52% ENERGY🛢️ BRENT$71.89/bbl▲ 0.68% CRYPTO₿ BTC$65,840.00▲ 1.85% IN🇮🇳 NIFTY 50₹26,178.95▲ 0.30% METAL🥈 SILVER$31.62/oz▲ 1.18% US💻 NASDAQ$18,179.59▲ 0.60% ENERGY🛢️ WTI CRUDE$68.18/bbl▲ 0.75% CRYPTOΞ ETH$2,664.20▲ 2.10% IN🇮🇳 SENSEX₹85,571.85▲ 0.28% US🏛️ DOW$42,313.00▲ 0.33% CRYPTO◎ SOL$156.40▲ 4.30% UK🇬🇧 FTSE 100£8,320.72▲ 0.43% CRYPTO⬡ BNB$598.20▲ 0.85%
Markets

Padma Shri Sunitha Krishnan's Enumeration Form Rejected Under SIR, No Prior Notice Received

Padma Shri awardee Sunitha Krishnan's enumeration form under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls was rejected. Krishnan stated that she received no prior notice during the SIR notice period to submit any of the 12 listed documents to prove citizenship. The rejection raises concerns about the SIR process and its impact on prominent citizens.

🎧 Listen to Story
Click play to listen to audio edition

In a development that has sparked concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the enumeration form of Padma Shri awardee Sunitha Krishnan was rejected. Krishnan, a renowned social activist and co-founder of Prajwala, said she received no notice during the SIR notice period asking her to submit any of the 12 listed documents to prove her citizenship. The rejection came to light on [date], highlighting potential flaws in the SIR process.

Sunitha Krishnan is a prominent figure in the fight against human trafficking and has been honored with the Padma Shri, one of India's highest civilian awards. The SIR, conducted by the Election Commission of India, requires individuals to provide specific documents to verify their citizenship and eligibility for voter rolls. Krishnan's case raises questions about whether the process is being implemented fairly, as she claims she was not given an opportunity to present her documents. The Election Commission has not yet issued a statement on this specific case.

The rejection of Krishnan's form has drawn criticism from various quarters, with activists and political leaders expressing concern that the SIR may disenfranchise legitimate voters. This incident could intensify the debate over the SIR's transparency and its impact on citizens, particularly those from marginalized communities. It remains to be seen how the Election Commission responds and whether Krishnan will challenge the rejection. The incident underscores the need for a thorough review of the SIR process to ensure it does not unfairly exclude eligible voters.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Leave a Comment

Your comment will appear after moderation. Max 2000 characters.